Logo world without fossil ads Logo world without fossil ads
    • AD BANS
    • ORGANISATIONS
    • KNOWLEDGE
      • FAQS
      • Research
      • Toolkit
    • BLOG
    • CONTACT
      • Get in touch
      • About us
    Sign in or Register

    The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments

    • About research
    • prev
    • next
    • prev
    • next
    Description

    The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments

    Conclusion: the transition to clean energy business models is not occurring, since the magnitude of investments and actions does not match discourse. Until actions and investment behavior are brought into alignment with discourse, accusations of greenwashing appear well-founded.

    (Li, Trencher, Asuka,  February 2022)

     

    Abstract

    The energy products of oil and gas majors have contributed significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and planetary warming over the past century. Decarbonizing the global economy by mid-century to avoid dangerous climate change thus cannot occur without a profound transformation of their fossil fuel-based business models. Recently, several majors are increasingly discussing clean energy and climate change, pledging decarbonization strategies, and investing in alternative energies. Some even claim to be transforming into clean energy companies. Given a history of obstructive climate actions and “greenwashing”, there is a need to objectively evaluate current and historical decarbonization efforts and investment behavior. This study focuses on two American (Chevron, ExxonMobil) and two European majors (BP, Shell). Using data collected over 2009–2020, we comparatively examine the extent of decarbonization and clean energy transition activity from three perspectives: (1) keyword use in annual reports (discourse); (2) business strategies (pledges and actions); and (3) production, expenditures and earnings for fossil fuels along with investments in clean energy (investments). We found a strong increase in discourse related to “climate”, “low-carbon” and “transition”, especially by BP and Shell. Similarly, we observed increasing tendencies toward strategies related to decarbonization and clean energy. But these are dominated by pledges rather than concrete actions. Moreover, the financial analysis reveals a continuing business model dependence on fossil fuels along with insignificant and opaque spending on clean energy. We thus conclude that the transition to clean energy business models is not occurring, since the magnitude of investments and actions does not match discourse. Until actions and investment behavior are brought into alignment with discourse, accusations of greenwashing appear well-founded.

    Related information

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0263596

    Author

    Mei Li, Gregory Trencher, Jusen Asuka

    Organization

    Plos One

    You May Also Be Interested In

    Nature publication: Local fossil fuel ad ban as a catalyst for global change

    • Nature
    • Thijs Bouman, Jan Willem Bolderdijk & E. Keith Smith
    • Quick view

    Scientific report: a ban on fossil ads is essential - but more measures are needed

    • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
    • T. Bouman, J.W. Bolderdijk, R.J. Renes, A.J. van der Wal, G. Paradies, S. Roeser, L. van de Grift, N. van Uffelen, G. de Vries, M.C. Onwezen, A.E.J. Wals, M.N.C. Aarts
    • Quick view

    An Experimental Study of the Impact of Greenwashing on Attitudes toward Fossil Fuel Corporations’ Sustainability Initiatives

    • State University op New York
    • Ronald S. Friedman & Dylan S. Campbell
    • Quick view

    Privacy & Cookie protocol | Colophon | This website is funded by KR Foundation

    Cart

      Manage Cookie Consent
      To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
      Functional Always active
      The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
      Preferences
      The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
      Statistics
      The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
      Marketing
      The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
      Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
      View preferences
      {title} {title} {title}